Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoreNews is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoreNews on whether to sell, buy or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk.
CryptoreNews covers fintech, blockchain and Bitcoin bringing you the latest crypto news and analyses on the future of money.
Federal prosecutors have charged former Robinhood Crypto engineers Hefu Chai, 36, and Huaisong “Jerry” Xiang, 30, with one count of commodities fraud and one count of wire fraud each. The charges allege that the two used confidential information regarding upcoming Robinhood token listings to trade related perpetual futures on the Hyperliquid platform before those listings became public.
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, each defendant allegedly profited more than $50,000 between 2025 and 2026.
Two Robinhood Engineers Charged With Trading on Confidential Crypto Listing Information
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York charged Robinhood engineers Hefu Chai and Huaisong Xiang with commodities fraud and wire fraud for allegedly using… pic.twitter.com/ilNUqbJJj4— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) September 15, 2026
The case is significant beyond the monetary figures because it extends crypto insider-trading enforcement to decentralized derivatives markets, rather than limiting it to spot exchanges.
Prosecutors are applying commodities fraud and wire fraud theories to trading on a venue that lacks a central listing desk or a traditional KYC gatekeeper. This signals that jurisdiction over misappropriated information does not stop at a platform’s front door.
How Did the Robinhood Engineers Use Hyperliquid to Conduct Insider Trading?
This is the poorest insider trading I’ve ever seen
Hefu Chai and Huaisong Xiang were engineers at Robinhood, and they made $50,000 each off insider trading
That is extremely weak, guys
I wouldn’t even lift a finger for that kind of pocket change
It’s beyond stupid to blow a… https://t.co/576iNc7cZv pic.twitter.com/rMbNkVs5UV— ProMint (@ProMint_X) September 15, 2026
On September 15, 2026, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York announced charges against Chai, who resides in Menlo Park, California, and Xiang, who resides in Jersey City, New Jersey.
Both engineers allegedly accessed nonpublic information about upcoming cryptocurrency listings and profited by buying perpetual futures on Hyperliquid before public announcements.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) claims this violated their confidentiality obligations for personal gain. U.S. Attorney Jamie McDonald emphasized that corporate insiders cannot evade laws by trading derivatives.
The commodities fraud charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, while the wire fraud charge could result in up to 20 years if convicted. Robinhood stated it is committed to market integrity, reported the matter to authorities, and is cooperating fully with the investigation.
Related Posts
Why Perps and the Legal Theory Matter in the Insider Trading Case
Perpetual futures allow traders to take leveraged bets on an asset’s price without holding the token, and they never expire as long as funding payments keep them aligned with the spot price.
This structure makes them ideal for front-running listing announcements, as there is no need to source the actual token and no custody risk involved.
The DOJ is pursuing this case under the Commodity Exchange Act and wire fraud statutes rather than securities fraud. This approach allows prosecutors to address derivatives trading on decentralized platforms without needing to debate the legal status of the underlying tokens.
This strategy differs from the earlier Coinbase case involving Ishan Wahi, who was charged for sharing confidential token-listing information.
Hyperliquid, a major decentralized platform for perpetual futures, is already under regulatory scrutiny, and this case adds a criminal dimension to its profile.
The takeaway for traders is clear: pre-listing perpetual futures flow on decentralized venues now falls within the DOJ’s focus, and insiders trading through derivatives may face risks similar to those trading spot tokens directly.
The charges against Chai and Xiang are allegations only, and both defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty. No trial date or plea has been reported.
Discover: The Best Token Presales
The post Who are Hefu Chai and Jerry Xiang in the Robinhood Insider Case appeared first on Cryptonews.
