US Legislator Urges Kansas Federal Reserve Regarding Approval of Kraken Exchange Master Account

Ranking Democrat of the House Financial Services Committee, Rep. Maxine Waters, sent a formal letter on Thursday to Jeff Schmid, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, seeking clarification on the reasons behind the granting of a Federal Reserve master account to Kraken’s banking subsidiary, as well as the practical implications of that access.

Waters has set a deadline of April 10 for a response, requesting Schmid to specify which Federal Reserve services Kraken can utilize, the restrictions in place, and the anti-money laundering and consumer protection measures that were assessed prior to the approval.

This inquiry goes beyond standard congressional oversight, representing a direct challenge to the validity of a significant crypto banking decision made by the Federal Reserve.

Key Takeaways:

• Legislative Pressure: Rep. Maxine Waters has requested the Kansas City Fed to respond by April 10, detailing the scope, limitations, and risk management associated with Kraken Financial’s master account approval.
• Kraken’s Position: Kraken Financial, a Wyoming SPDI operating under a full-reserve, no-lending model, became the first crypto-native firm to obtain Fed master account access, granted as a one-year pilot on March 4, 2026.
• What’s at Stake: The account provides Kraken with direct access to Fedwire, positioning a crypto exchange alongside commercial banks and credit unions — a structural change that traditional banking entities deem premature and unclear.

Discover: Why Coinbase rejected the updated Digital Asset Market Clarity Act draft — and what it signals for crypto’s regulatory runway

What Waters Is Actually Demanding

The congressional examination of the Kansas City Fed’s approval process revolves around a primary concern: the Fed revealed very little information.

The Kansas City Fed’s press release specifically mentioned business confidentiality as the reason for withholding details regarding the services accessible to Kraken, a position Waters deemed inadequate given the implications.

Source: PCF

Waters stated that “the Kansas City Fed’s announcement does not provide specific information about Kraken’s access to the range of Federal Reserve financial services due to the confidentiality of business information submitted by applicants.”

Her letter requests detailed information: which Fedwire functions, what ACH access is available, what safeguards are in place, and how the approval aligns with existing statutory frameworks.

The account in question is a limited-purpose, or “skinny”, master account, granting Kraken Financial Tier 3 access to Fedwire and potentially ACH for reserve holdings and settlements.

This does not include access to Fed liquidity facilities. Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman characterized the arrangement at an American Bankers Association conference on March 11 as a learning opportunity: “We’re trying to learn,” she noted, recognizing that the Fed could intervene if behaviors were found to be inconsistent.

Kraken Financial operates as a Payward subsidiary under Wyoming’s Special Purpose Depository Institution framework, adhering to a full-reserve, no lending model, without FDIC insurance. Every deposit is backed 1:1. This structure was pivotal to the approval argument, yet it has not silenced critics.

Bank Policy Institute policy counsel Paige Pidano Paridon remarked that the approval “disregards public comments that the Federal Reserve sought on this framework, and it was issued with no transparency regarding the approval process or the risk mitigants.” The Fed had concluded a public comment period on a crypto payment prototype account proposal less than one month prior to the March 4 approval, a timeline that has intensified frustration within the banking sector.

What to Watch

The deeper implication is precedent. Custodia Bank, also a Wyoming SPDI, was denied a master account in 2023 after years of litigation. Kraken’s approval under the same institutional framework, without a finalized Fed policy, indicates that the criteria for access remain effectively unclear, which is exactly what Waters is addressing.

Transparency requirements arising from this congressional dialogue could influence whether any future crypto firm can follow in Kraken’s footsteps or if this pilot becomes an isolated exception.

The April 10 deadline for Kansas City Fed President Schmid’s response to Waters represents an immediate turning point. If Schmid provides detailed information on service access and risk protocols, it would normalize the approval and diminish the transparency critique.

If he cites confidentiality and deflects, congressional pressure may escalate, potentially leading to formal committee hearings that would place the entire Fed crypto banking framework under public scrutiny.

The one-year pilot evaluation and Kraken’s IPO timeline are progressing concurrently. How the Fed responds to Congress will determine whether Kraken’s master account becomes a model for crypto banking access or the last one approved before the opportunity closes.

The post US Lawmaker Presses Kansas Fed Over Kraken Exchange Master Account Approval appeared first on Cryptonews.