Bitcoin Whale Awakens After Seven Years to Move $188 Million in Dormant Coins

A Bitcoin holder has moved 2,931 BTC, valued at approximately $188 million, for the first time since October 2018. The coins have not yet appeared on any known cryptocurrency exchange.

Data from Arkham Intelligence indicates that on July 12, the funds were transferred from an address beginning with “356my” to a new SegWit address starting with “bc1qnzk.”

The originating address received the 2,931 BTC eight years ago, when Bitcoin was trading near $6,500. At the time of the recent transfer, the position’s dollar value had increased nearly tenfold, with Bitcoin trading around $64,000.

Related Reading

Dormant Bitcoin whale last active at $12 per BTC awakens sending funds to Kraken

The sudden BTC whale activity suggests profit-taking as long-term holders cash in on Bitcoin's historical gains Sep 11, 2025 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Approximately nine hours later, the receiving address “bc1qnzk” forwarded the entire balance to a second destination, “bc1qyen,” via a separate transaction between the unidentified wallets.

As of press time, the second address held the 2,931 BTC and had recorded no outgoing transactions. Arkham Intelligence had not attributed the new destination to an exchange, custodian, or other identified entity.

Bitcoin Whale Address Balance (Source: Arkham Intelligence)

Each of the two large transactions sent nearly the full balance to a single address rather than dividing it among multiple destinations.

Market observers noted that this pattern is consistent with a wallet migration or a custody reorganization, although blockchain records cannot definitively establish the holder’s identity, motive, or continued control over the coins.

Meanwhile, an unlabeled destination does not necessarily mean the coins avoided an exchange, broker, or over-the-counter trading desk. Blockchain attribution has blind spots, and newly created deposit or custody wallets often appear without labels.

What would change the transfer’s signal?

A subsequent transfer to an address associated with an exchange would strengthen the possibility that the holder intends to sell some or all of the Bitcoin. Even then, a deposit would indicate only that the coins had become available for trading, not that a sale had occurred.

Conversely, a distribution across several addresses linked to exchanges, brokers, or other liquidity providers would make the transfer appear more like preparation for a sale.

However, CryptoSlate has previously demonstrated how such large transfers can inflate on-chain movement without creating net new exchange supply.

Related Reading

No, 800k BTC didn't hit the market: Why exchange internal transfers fooled traders

Inside address consolidation, proof-of-reserve prep, and why these moves spook retail despite neutral market impact. Nov 25, 2025 · Gino Matos

On the other hand, the holder could choose to move the coins into an identified lender or collateral platform, which would create a different signal.

This would imply that the holder is using the BTC holdings to obtain liquidity without selling them, leaving the coins economically active but not necessarily adding them to the spot market supply.

Lastly, another full-balance transfer to an unidentified address could extend the current custody pattern rather than establish market distribution.

For now, the blockchain shows that a long-held Bitcoin position moved through two unidentified addresses.

However, the market signal around them would change if the coins entered a known exchange, were spread across liquidity-linked wallets, or moved to a platform where they could be pledged or sold.

The post Is a Bitcoin whale from 2018 about to cash in after awakening to transfer $188 million? appeared first on CryptoSlate.