Trump to implement five cryptocurrency changes promptly via executive order in response to regulatory hurdles.

A recent Bloomberg report indicates that Trump plans to prioritize cryptocurrency through an executive order. Details circulating among industry participants suggest that this action could impact businesses and influence enforcement across various digital asset sectors.

However, executive orders are constrained by the checks and balances established in the US Constitution. Trump is reportedly aiming to implement the following policies via executive order:

• Designate cryptocurrency as a national priority.
• Establish a cryptocurrency advisory council.
• Instruct agencies to review digital asset policies.
• Pause or cease litigation against cryptocurrency companies.
• Create a national Bitcoin reserve.

What does this signify, and how much can he alter through an executive order alone?

According to Bloomberg’s anonymous sources, the draft order is expected to declare cryptocurrency a significant initiative and establish an advisory council. This council would promote collaboration among agencies, although it would primarily issue recommendations rather than enforce binding regulations.

Presidential directives typically rely on the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires transparency and public accountability when new advisory groups are formed. Such a measure generally encounters fewer legal obstacles, allowing the executive branch to advance a broader focus on cryptocurrency-related policy issues without waiting for new legislation.

Another aspect under consideration is a directive for agencies to review regulations and enforcement strategies regarding digital assets. Such internal audits and policy evaluations fall well within standard executive authority, especially when they involve generating reports or recommendations.

Previous administrations have utilized similar strategies to highlight emerging issues and prompt coordinated responses. Market participants anticipate that an official review could lead to more consistent approaches across the Treasury, Justice Department, and other entities overseeing cryptocurrency.

Some policies may pose challenges to implement via executive order

However, proposals to suspend litigation involving cryptocurrency companies suggest a more contentious approach. Enforcement actions against industry participants, including those by the SEC and CFTC, stem from mandates that grant these agencies a degree of independence.

Direct intervention could conflict with statutory obligations and established prosecutorial norms, raising concerns about judicial interference. While executive influence over the Department of Justice exists, instructing it to suspend active cases would likely provoke significant legal and political backlash.

The possibility of expanding a government-held Bitcoin reserve remains under consideration but is likely to face congressional scrutiny. Current laws typically dictate the disposal or auctioning of seized assets, with proceeds directed into government accounts or utilized for law enforcement activities.

Building a long-term reserve of Bitcoin raises questions regarding budgetary authority since appropriations lie within Congress’s jurisdiction. Proponents view such a reserve as a strategic move, noting that the government already possesses approximately $20 billion worth of Bitcoin seized through various investigations. Critics contend that formalizing these holdings would require specific statutory approval, given constitutional limitations on executive spending.

TLDR;

Specific actions—such as designating cryptocurrency as a priority, forming advisory bodies, and directing agency reviews—fit within standard executive powers. Broader initiatives, including halting enforcement across independent agencies or establishing a permanent Bitcoin reserve, lean toward issues that necessitate cooperation from Congress. These distinctions may influence the scope of the forthcoming order and determine whether its impact extends beyond advisory measures into substantive regulatory changes.

Initiative	EO Power Feasibility
Designate cryptocurrency as a national priority	Clearly feasible
Establish a cryptocurrency advisory council	Generally feasible
Instruct agencies to review digital asset policies	Highly feasible
Pause or cease litigation against cryptocurrency companies	Legally problematic
Create a national Bitcoin reserve	Requires Congressional approval

Although the final text has not yet been released, stakeholders are preparing for guidelines that may redefine how the federal government engages with the cryptocurrency industry as early as Monday, Jan. 20.

Implementation will depend on existing agency frameworks and any statutory limitations that govern specific areas of enforcement or treasury operations. The extent of the order’s reach remains uncertain, but clarifying the administration’s position on digital assets could encourage closer coordination among regulators and market participants.

The post Trump to enact 5 crypto changes ASAP via executive order amid red tape appeared first on CryptoSlate.