Global “Bye America” investors abandon US risk as Bitcoin emerges as the macro alternative.

The “Bye America” trade tends to reemerge when discussions shift from whether the U.S. remains the safest investment option to considerations about the cost of residing in it.

In the last week, this conversation has manifested in the dollar. A declining dollar is seldom a standalone narrative, yet it typically brings a familiar array of effects: global investment portfolios reevaluate their exposure to U.S. assets, hedges are recalibrated, and risk allocations are adjusted.

Bitcoin has been harnessing some of that momentum, but to fully comprehend this shift, one must look beyond mere chart patterns and delve into the dynamics that connect currency fluctuations to cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin does not trade directly against the dollar. Rather, it reacts to the conditions set by whatever influences the dollar, particularly real yields, hedging expenses, and the allocation of risk across portfolios.

When these factors align, Bitcoin can function as a macro alternative. Conversely, when they diverge, it behaves like a high-beta liquid asset that is sold off when cash is limited.

Related Reading

US Treasurys face a $1.7 trillion EU “dump” over Greenland, forcing shift to Bitcoin if dollar safety vanishes

European leaders are eyeing U.S. Treasurys as leverage over Greenland, posing a risk of a one-month yield shock for Americans.

Jan 21, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Understanding the “Bye America” concept in market terms

“Bye America” may seem like a political catchphrase with a rather extreme implication, but in financial markets, it denotes a simple accounting principle.

It serves as shorthand for global investors becoming increasingly uneasy about holding U.S. risk at current valuations, or growing reluctant to maintain unhedged positions, or both.

Graph illustrating the US Dollar Index (DXY) from Sep. 26, 2022, to Jan. 30, 2026 (Source: Barchart)

This can occur for various reasons, which can simultaneously take place. The market might be reassessing the trajectory of Fed policy, particularly if economic growth is slowing and interest rate cuts are imminent. It can also be reevaluating fiscal risks through the lens of deficits and future issuances.

Additionally, it may be reassessing policy uncertainty, which quickly manifests in the foreign exchange market, as it is where global investors can express discomfort without needing to liquidate entire equity or credit portfolios.

The crucial takeaway is that while the headline suggests negative sentiment, the underlying trade is largely mechanical. Investors do not need to incinerate the American flag to reduce their exposure to USD assets; they merely require the anticipated return, adjusted for currency, hedging costs, and volatility, to appear less favorable than alternatives.

Bitcoin can gain from this reassessment, but only through those same mechanisms. It becomes part of the trade when investors are already seeking assets less dependent on U.S. policy outcomes, less tied to U.S. duration, or simply less linked to U.S. institutional risks.

Related Reading

Federal Reserve to abandon ‘boring' FOMC language, ending dovish vs hawkish analysis?

We’re about to witness the outcome when the Federal Reserve replaces monotonous conservatism with Trump-era populist rhetoric.

Feb 1, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Four channels through which FX can create a Bitcoin demand

The first channel involves financial conditions, which often confound people. A weaker dollar can ease conditions worldwide since much credit and trade are still denominated in dollars.

When the dollar weakens due to a shift toward more accommodative policy, global risk appetite tends to increase, benefiting Bitcoin as part of the larger risk spectrum.

However, a weaker dollar can also emerge during periods of stress. If the cause is disorder, political turmoil, or rate volatility, the same decline may coincide with tighter risk parameters. In such instances, the dollar chart may appear “risk on” while the actual portfolio response is to decrease exposure.

This is why the correlation between the dollar and Bitcoin is often inconsistent as a rule, even when it appears straightforward in retrospect.

The second channel connects to real yields, as they condense numerous macro factors into a single metric. When real yields decline, long-duration assets typically find it easier to perform because the discount rate falls and the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets diminishes.

Bitcoin frequently trades in this manner, even though it is not a bond and does not generate cash flow. It occupies a space in markets where liquidity and discount rates are significant, and decreasing real yields can foster an environment where investors are inclined to pay for scarce assets.

This also clarifies why Bitcoin behaves differently from gold. Gold has a long-established role as reserve collateral and can maintain this role across various regimes. Bitcoin’s version of this function is newer and more reliant on market structure.

When liquidity is plentiful and macro factors are supportive, Bitcoin can resemble an alternative to gold. However, when liquidity tightens, it may act like a risk asset that is the first to be sold because it is liquid and easy to offload.

The third channel encompasses hedging and cross-border transactions, which represent the underlying mathematics of many significant movements. For a non-U.S. investor, owning U.S. assets is a dual bet on the asset and the dollar. If they hedge the currency risk, the return stabilizes, but the hedge incurs a cost.

This cost is influenced by interest rate differentials and the state of dollar funding within the swap market. When hedging becomes pricier, investors face a straightforward choice: endure currency fluctuations or scale back their exposure.

A dramatic shift in reserve status is not necessary for this to be significant; it merely requires hedging to become less appealing on the margin. When a sufficient number of investors make that same choice, it can impact the pricing of U.S. assets and the flow of capital into alternatives.

Bitcoin does not automatically benefit from that inflow, but a scenario where investors are increasingly wary of unhedged USD exposure also fosters a discourse around non-sovereign alternatives, especially in portfolios that already consider Bitcoin as a minor diversifier alongside commodities or gold.

The fourth channel pertains to the leverage mechanism within crypto, often determining whether a price movement sustains. Bitcoin rallies can originate from spot buying or leverage. A spot-driven increase typically develops more gradually and is easier to maintain since it relies on cash buyers.

However, given the size of the derivatives market and the pace of institutional adoption, such occurrences are rare.

Conversely, a leverage-driven rally may initially appear robust but can become precarious as it relies on traders paying to maintain their positions, which can lead to forced selling if prices stagnate.

This emphasizes the importance of crypto’s underlying infrastructure over the macro narrative. A macro demand expressed through spot buying can withstand volatility. In contrast, a macro demand primarily represented through futures leverage can evaporate within a day.

Related Reading

Trump’s Fed pick Kevin Warsh is “not nervous” about Bitcoin while plotting a digital dollar takeover

Warsh’s appointment indicates potential shifts in digital currency strategy, as he advocates for a digital dollar while acknowledging Bitcoin’s technological promise.

Jan 31, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Identifying authenticity and potential breakdowns

For the “Bye America” perspective to be relevant for Bitcoin, the evidence must initially appear monotonous, more indicative of persistence than spectacular changes.

One would expect the macro factors that generally support Bitcoin to remain intact. This does not imply the dollar must decline daily, but rather that the overall framework should continue to indicate more accommodating conditions, lower real yields, and controllable volatility.

When these factors are stable, investors can maintain their allocations, allowing Bitcoin to steadily rise without the need for dramatic single-day fluctuations that dominate headlines.

Demand should also be expressed in a manner that does not hinge on constant leverage. ETF flow data can help verify whether there is consistent underlying demand, despite daily figures being subject to noise and occasional misinterpretation.

Derivatives pricing is also crucial, as it indicates whether traders are willing to pay to stay long, which is often where vulnerabilities arise.

The typical failure scenario is a sharp reversal. FX narratives dissipate quickly when the dollar rebounds strongly, particularly if real yields rise simultaneously, as that combination tightens conditions and increases the cost of holding scarce, non-yielding assets.

More critically, a sudden surge in volatility can compel funds with mechanical risk parameters to reduce exposure across the board. In such moments, Bitcoin does not receive any special consideration and is sold for the same reasons as other liquid assets: because risk limits are binding, and cash becomes paramount.

Thus, a clear way to contemplate Bitcoin’s trajectory in the upcoming weeks is to assess which channel is driving the movement.

If the positive momentum for Bitcoin stems from easing real yields and consistent allocations, it can continue to rise.

If the impetus is derived from crowded leverage based on sentiment, it can vanish the instant the narrative encounters a hawkish report, an unexpected rate change, or a volatility spike that necessitates risk reduction.

The post As global “Bye America” investors ditch US risk, Bitcoin is finally ready to be the macro alternative appeared first on CryptoSlate.