Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoreNews is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoreNews on whether to sell, buy or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk.
CryptoreNews covers fintech, blockchain and Bitcoin bringing you the latest crypto news and analyses on the future of money.
Exchanges to halt trading and withdrawals following countdown under new cryptocurrency legislation – what’s your timeframe?
Cryptocurrency firms catering to EU residents commenced the collection of tax information on January 1, 2026, in accordance with the European Union’s DAC8 regulations. This commencement date has sparked widespread assertions on X that the union has effectively “terminated crypto privacy.”
The guidance from the European Commission regarding DAC8 identifies January 1, 2026, as the date when data collection operations will begin. Nevertheless, many analysts are exaggerating their interpretations, and the suggested timeline appears constricted.
What DAC8’s January 1 start date truly signifies in practice
Service providers will gather data throughout 2026, with the initial comprehensive annual reports expected in 2027. The Commission outlines a nine-month period, running from the close of the first fiscal year until September 30, 2027.
Consequently, 2026 will serve as the year for infrastructure development and data acquisition. The more significant implications for enforcement are likely to materialize when reports can be cross-referenced on a large scale internationally.
Related Reading
Europe tightens crypto regulations with new anti-money laundering laws
The cryptocurrency landscape in Europe prepares for repercussions as newly implemented strict AML guidelines indicate enhanced KYC standards and oversight.
Apr 25, 2024 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo
DAC8, enacted through Directive (EU) 2023/2226, increases tax visibility within the regulated framework rather than abolishing self-custody. The directive focuses on the reporting obligations of crypto-asset service providers and their users residing in the EU.
This encompasses exchanges between cryptocurrency and fiat currencies, transactions between different crypto-assets, and “transfers.” The definition of “transfers” is sufficiently broad to include withdrawals from an exchange account to an address that is not managed by the same provider for that user.
As a result, “unhosted” or self-custody destinations are included within the reportable range. Materials from the European Parliament Research Service regarding DAC8 also indicate that the reporting summary will contain “transfers to un-hosted distributed ledger addresses.”
Assertions that providers are required to submit a user’s “complete transaction history” directly to tax authorities are exaggerated. The reporting frequency is annual, and the European Commission’s impact assessment outlines a policy design aimed at finding a balance between detail and administrative load.
This incorporates aggregation in certain reporting segments, while still mandating standardized identity and account details that facilitate cross-border matching. The practical shift is that activities initiated at a reporting provider, including withdrawals to self-custody, will no longer terminate the information trail at the regulated chokepoint.
Related Reading
The end of privacy in Europe? Germany’s shift on EU Chat Control raises alarm
Germany’s potential reversal on the EU Chat Control initiative raises concerns among privacy advocates. The Signal messaging application warns that this could signify the demise of encrypted privacy rights in Europe.
Oct 5, 2025 · Christina Comben
DAC8 transfers the compliance responsibility to onboarding, identity verification, and access controls
The most significant pressure point for users under DAC8 is the onboarding and documentation process. The directive mandates that providers acquire necessary information such as a tax identification number.
If a user fails to provide this information, the provider must ultimately restrict the user from conducting “Reportable Transactions,” but only after two notifications and not prior to 60 days. This is less stringent than an immediate, blanket “freeze,” yet it can still hinder trading and withdrawal activities that fall under the reportable category.
The infrastructure for exchanges is now more defined. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2263 establishes standardized forms and electronic formats for obligatory information exchange, providing tax authorities with a common framework for data ingestion and reconciliation.
The Commission’s impact assessment anticipates approximately €1.7 billion in extra annual revenue from crypto-asset transactions based on its central scenario. Materials from the European Parliament suggest a broader estimate ranging from €1 billion to €2.4 billion annually.
This assessment also estimates compliance expenses for providers at around €259 million as a one-time cost and approximately €22.6 million to €24 million as recurring annual expenses. It further projects administrative development costs for member states.
| What changes now, and what changes later | Timing | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Providers commence collecting DAC8 data | Jan. 1, 2026 | European Commission (Taxation and Customs Union) |
| Initial full-year reports due | By Sept. 30, 2027 | European Commission (Taxation and Customs Union) |
| Scope includes exchanges and transfers to unhosted addresses | Collection starts in 2026 | Directive (EU) 2023/2226; European Parliament EPRS |
| Estimated annual revenue increase, central case | ~€1.7 billion | European Commission impact assessment |
| Estimated provider compliance costs | ~€259 million one-off, ~€22.6 million to €24 million recurring | European Commission impact assessment |
How DAC8 transforms platform economics and international crypto operations
For platforms, the cost structure and the “no TIN, no reportable transactions” regulation could alter competitive dynamics. Fixed development costs for reporting infrastructure, customer due diligence, and transfer record-keeping may push smaller providers towards mergers, third-party compliance solutions, or a more limited EU product offering.
Related Reading
Stablecoins put on notice as EU lawmakers agree on landmark MiCA framework
While MiCA will provide much-needed regulatory clarity, crypto companies will encounter stricter guidelines under the new framework.
Jul 1, 2022 · Samuel Wan
Larger platforms may be more capable of distributing these costs over a broader user base. Nevertheless, the practical implications of the rule will rely on how providers enforce controls around reportable activities.
DAC8 also aligns Europe with a wider convergence trajectory. The OECD reports that 58 jurisdictions have expressed intentions to initiate exchanges under its Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework in 2027.
This diminishes the benefit of shifting activities offshore when corresponding jurisdictions exchange equivalent datasets.
In such a landscape, DAC8 does not eliminate private key control, but it transforms regulated entry and exit points, including withdrawals to self-custody, into standardized reportable events that tax authorities can utilize in the 2027 reporting cycles.
The post Exchanges to freeze trading and withdrawals after countdown under new crypto law – how long do you have? appeared first on CryptoSlate.