Chainalysis reports that the use of cryptocurrency for financing terrorism constitutes a small percentage of total activity.

A recent analysis by Chainalysis has raised questions about exaggerated assertions concerning the utilization of cryptocurrency by terrorist groups for funding purposes.

Following a recent attack by Hamas in Israel, the analysis seeks to clarify misunderstandings related to the involvement of digital currencies in terrorism financing.

Clarifying misunderstandings

Chainalysis, a prominent entity in blockchain analysis, recognizes that certain terrorist organizations, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, do employ cryptocurrency for the purposes of raising, storing, and transferring funds.

Nonetheless, the analysis highlights that this activity represents merely a minuscule portion of the total cryptocurrency transaction volume, a minor segment of the illicit activities associated with digital currencies.

The report challenges inflated metrics and erroneous analyses concerning the cryptocurrency usage by terrorist organizations, stressing that conventional fiat-based methods — such as financial institutions, hawalas, and shell companies — continue to be the primary channels for financing these groups.

Importance of service providers

A significant point from the report is the inherent transparency of blockchain technology, which enables cryptocurrency transactions to be traced from start to finish.

This transparency facilitates collaboration between government entities and private organizations equipped with blockchain analysis tools to effectively identify and disrupt the flow of funds — a task that is considerably more difficult with traditional value transfer methods.

The report also explored the role of service providers in the transfer of funds related to terrorism.

According to the analysis, investigative efforts often need to concentrate on service providers, such as money services businesses, which can handle substantial volumes of funds. Chainalysis discovered that these suspected service providers may resemble over-the-counter (OTC) brokers or street-level money businesses like hawala.

Data points

To demonstrate the complexity, the report provided an example where a wallet linked to terror financing had at least 20 suspected service providers as counterparties. These providers received varying amounts of cryptocurrency from all their counterparties, ranging from $8.4 million to $1.1 billion.

Further examination of one of these counterparties revealed considerable activity, with over 1,300 deposits and 1,200 withdrawals over a span of 7.5 months. Approximately $450,000 worth of funds from the identified terror-affiliated wallet were transferred through this address.

The report indicates that this address likely represents a service provider that may be facilitating terror financing activities, either knowingly or unknowingly.

Mixing of funds

However, the report also cautioned against making hasty conclusions. While large amounts of cryptocurrency may seem to be raised for terror financing, a significant portion of these funds could be unrelated to terrorism.

Chainalysis advised against including all transaction activities conducted by these service providers in estimates related to terrorism financing, as they may not be directly associated with such activities.

The report also underscored the complexities involved in tracing funds through service providers, where cryptocurrencies can be pooled and mixed with other users’ funds.

This complicates the tracking of funds once they have been deposited with a service provider, as only the service provider has access to details about specific customer transactions.

Chainalysis acknowledged the difficulties in providing accurate estimates for funds directed specifically to terrorist organizations, especially in the absence of verified information from law enforcement.

Coinbase aligns with this perspective

Coinbase has similarly contended that the majority of terrorist funding continues to depend on traditional cash rather than cryptocurrencies.

The exchange issued a statement in response to concerns regarding the use of crypto for illicit activities, particularly following reports about Hamas utilizing crypto for financing. Coinbase emphasized that the transparency of blockchain technology facilitates easier tracking of crypto transactions compared to cash payments.

The exchange also advocated for clear regulations to ensure compliance within the crypto industry in the U.S. and other regulated jurisdictions, noting that reports of terrorist funding through digital assets frequently involve offshore entities not subject to U.S. laws.

The post Chainalysis says crypto usage for terror financing is ‘tiny fraction’ of overall volume appeared first on CryptoSlate.