Bitcoin’s “consistent purchasers” begin to divest as financial strains from debt and liquidity increase.

In July 2025, Genius Group revealed its ambition to establish a Bitcoin treasury of 10,000 BTC, presenting it as a demonstration of profound strategic belief.

This week, however, the firm liquidated its remaining 84 BTC to settle $8.5 million in debt, announcing its treasury depleted. The 18-month interval between these two events exemplifies the current dynamics of the Bitcoin treasury trade.

Why this matters: The Bitcoin treasury narrative has been one of the market’s most compelling structural bullish arguments. If corporate and sovereign holders act as cyclical sellers instead of long-term accumulators, institutional adoption may increase volatility rather than provide stability.

Public companies, such as Empery, Genius Group, and Riot, have all divested Bitcoin this week, citing reasons like debt repayment, liquidity requirements, or strategic shifts towards AI and high-performance computing, while sovereign selling accelerates, with Bhutan liquidating additional holdings.

Individually, each of these actions can be easily rationalized as non-events. However, collectively, they reveal a structural issue with a trade predicated on the notion of permanence: for an increasing number of holders, Bitcoin has become the first asset they liquidate when financial obligations arise.

The treasury trade is based on a straightforward premise. Beginning around 2020 and gaining momentum through 2024, publicly traded companies started acquiring Bitcoin using corporate cash or borrowed funds, presenting it to investors as a reserve asset that outperforms cash eroded by inflation.

A few notable early adopters achieved remarkable returns, leading to the strategy’s proliferation. Public companies currently possess approximately 1.165 million Bitcoin, valued at around $77 billion, which constitutes over five percent of the total supply of 21 million coins.

The challenge is that a reserve asset only serves its intended purpose if the holder never requires the cash back.

Related Reading

Bitcoin treasury trade faces a new test after Nakamoto sold $20M at a loss

The sale transforms paper losses into a funding challenge as markets begin to differentiate between stronger Bitcoin treasury strategies and weaker ones.

Mar 31, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

In the Bitcoin treasury trade, the debt comes first

Riot Platforms, one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin miners in the US, sold 5,363 BTC for approximately $535.5 million in 2025, with its annual filing explicitly linking retention choices to cash needs for operations and growth.

An earlier filing had already revealed 3,300 BTC pledged as collateral against a $200 million credit facility. Riot continues to utilize its treasury to support a transition into AI and high-performance computing, a strategy increasingly observed across the mining sector.

MARA Holdings sold 15,133 BTC for around $1.1 billion in March, using the proceeds to retire about $1 billion of convertible senior notes. Empery Digital sold 370 BTC for $24.7 million and applied the proceeds to fully repay its outstanding term loan, releasing 1,800 BTC it had previously used as collateral. Its shares have declined by 75% from their 2025 peak.

The pattern is consistent among all of them: Bitcoin accumulated during periods of optimism, pledged when capital was necessary, and liquidated when debts became due.

It is noteworthy that the largest and most well-capitalized players continue to expand their positions.

Metaplanet acquired 5,075 BTC in the first quarter of 2026, making it the third-largest corporate holder, while Strategy maintains over 762,000 BTC, representing by far the largest treasury position in existence.

This indicates that the treasury trade is not collapsing uniformly but is dividing into two groups: deep-pocketed accumulators who can afford to wait, and cash-strapped sellers who find, when conditions tighten, that their strategic reserve is their most liquid asset.

The reserve asset that was always too easy to sell

The Bitcoin treasury trade gains significant weight when sovereign entities participate.

Bhutan, a small Himalayan kingdom, established one of the world’s more unconventional government Bitcoin positions by mining it using surplus hydroelectric power at minimal cost. The country’s holdings have decreased from a peak of about 13,000 BTC in late 2024 to roughly 5,400 BTC, a 58% reduction, with management handled by its state-owned investment entity, Druk Holding and Investments.

Throughout March 2026, Bhutan sold tens of millions worth of BTC through controlled, low-impact transfers without disrupting the market. This distribution pattern indicates that the treasury was undergoing a planned drawdown rather than being forced by debt.

A substantial portion of the cash from the sold Bitcoin was allocated to Gelephu Mindfulness City, a significant national development initiative requiring real capital. Since Bhutan mined its coins instead of purchasing them, every sale was pure profit. The underlying rationale, however, mirrors that of the previously mentioned corporate sellers: the position exists to be monetized when funding needs arise.

Bitcoin has been struggling to maintain support at $67,000, fluctuating around this critical level for several days. Altcoins are also facing challenges, with larger coins like ETH and SOL experiencing daily losses between 4% and 8%, while smaller tokens continue to exhibit even greater volatility. With $200 million to $400 million liquidated daily over the past week, it is evident that crypto markets are feeling significant geopolitical pressure.

In this context, treasury selling does more than simply increase supply in a struggling market. It reveals something that the most enthusiastic proponents of the treasury trade may not have fully anticipated: they constructed a buyer base from the wrong material.

There is a profound irony in this. The very characteristics that made Bitcoin appealing as a treasury asset initially (its liquidity, its 24-hour markets, the seamless ease of converting it to cash at any time) are precisely the traits that make it the first asset a cash-strapped CFO turns to when a debt payment is imminent.

In comparison to gold, Bitcoin is remarkably quick and easy to sell, and the Bitcoin treasury promise of providing a liquid alternative to cash inadvertently offered companies, well…a liquid alternative to cash.

Liquidity, by its nature, gets utilized. Every company that pledged its BTC as loan collateral simultaneously created a forced-selling mechanism and embedded a potential margin call within its own balance sheet.

The longer-term implications for Bitcoin are challenging to quantify but still merit serious consideration. The narrative of institutional adoption has been one of the most resilient bullish arguments for Bitcoin over the past four years, based on the assumption that corporate and sovereign buyers represent a fundamentally different, more stable class of holder than retail speculators.

If the current wave of selling instead establishes that treasury holders are merely pro-cyclical, buying during periods of enthusiasm, pledging during expansion, and then liquidating during stress, then the influx of institutional capital does little to alter Bitcoin’s volatility profile. It merely adds a more elaborately dressed version of the same behavior.

The remaining buyers, Strategy with its 762,000 BTC and Metaplanet with its systematic quarterly accumulation, may still validate the thesis, but they are doing so almost in isolation, which was never the intention.

The treasury trade was meant to be a movement, a permanent re-evaluation of how the world’s balance sheets relate to a fixed-supply digital asset. What it appears to have become, for a significant and growing number of its participants, is a short-term financing strategy masquerading as long-term conviction. When the facade is removed, what remains is an asset that individuals purchase when they have surplus funds and sell when they do not, which is not a reserve but merely another position.

The post Bitcoin’s “permanent buyers” are starting to sell as debt and cash pressures mount appeared first on CryptoSlate.