Bitcoin options have surpassed futures for the first time, and the new approach institutions use for hedging is constraining retail leverage.

By mid-January, the open interest in Bitcoin options surged to approximately $74.1 billion, surpassing the Bitcoin futures open interest, which stood at around $65.22 billion.

Open interest refers to the total number of outstanding contracts that have not been settled or expired, thus representing position inventory rather than trading activity. Consequently, when options inventory exceeds futures, it often indicates a market that relies less on straightforward directional leverage and more on structured exposure, such as hedges, yield overlays, and volatility positioning.

Futures remain the most straightforward method for gaining leveraged exposure to Bitcoin’s price movement. However, options provide traders and institutions the ability to fine-tune risk with greater accuracy through payoff profiles that can limit losses, profit from upward movement, or target specific volatility outcomes.

This distinction is significant because options positions often remain active longer than futures positions, and this persistence can affect how volatility behaves around key strikes, expirations, and liquidity periods. The fact that options have surpassed futures represents a significant milestone for the market, with clear implications for Bitcoin trading on a daily basis.

Related Reading

Bitcoin’s $55 billion options market is now obsessing over one specific date that forces a $100k showdown

The options curve is heavily weighted for Dec. 26—and the subsequent unwind.

Dec 13, 2025 · Andjela Radmilac

Why options open interest can exceed futures

Futures are designed for direct exposure and swift repositioning. Traders put up margin, buy or sell a contract linked to Bitcoin, and then manage funding rates, basis shifts, and the liquidation risks that increase with leverage.

Futures positions can scale rapidly, but they are also very sensitive to carrying costs. When funding becomes burdensome or a basis trade ceases to be profitable, positions are unwound. During broader leverage resets, futures open interest declines sharply as quick traders rush to mitigate risk, while slower ones are forced out.

Options, in contrast, tend to behave differently as they are frequently utilized as longer-term structures rather than just pure leverage. Calls and puts convert a viewpoint into a specified payoff profile, while spreads, collars, and covered calls transform spot exposure into a managed risk position.

This results in inventory that can persist over weeks or months, as it is often linked to a hedge, a systematic yield program, or a volatility strategy that rolls on a specified schedule. When positions are maintained until a designated expiry, open interest becomes inherently sticky.

The calendar illustrates this clearly. Checkonchain’s data indicates a sharp decline in options open interest around late December, followed by a rebuild into early January, which aligns with the pattern of a significant expiry passing and the market re-establishing risk for the upcoming cycle.

Graph showing Bitcoin options open interest from Oct. 18, 2025, to Jan. 16, 2026 (Source: Checkonchain)

Futures open interest during the same period appears steadier and more incremental, reflecting a market where positions are continuously adjusted rather than being mechanically cleared by expiration. This difference clarifies why options can surpass futures even in a choppy price environment, where conviction seems mixed.

Related Reading

BlackRock's $40B IBIT options: Is Bitcoin’s volatility now the market’s favorite income play?

The largest Bitcoin trade today isn’t buying, it’s overwriting.

Oct 21, 2025 · Andjela Radmilac

Graph showing Bitcoin futures open interest from Oct. 18, 2025, to Jan. 16, 2026 (Source: Checkonchain)

As options open interest increases, the market-making layer becomes increasingly crucial. Dealers who facilitate options flow often hedge their exposure using spot and futures, and that hedging can impact price behavior near significant strikes and during expiry periods.

In heavily positioned markets, hedging can either mitigate moves or enhance them, depending on how exposures are spread across strikes and maturities.

Thus, high options open interest serves as a map indicating where hedging intensity might rise, especially when liquidity diminishes or the market gravitates toward crowded levels.

The split market: crypto-native options and listed ETF options like IBIT

Bitcoin options have evolved into a fragmented ecosystem with multiple participant bases. Checkonchain’s exchange-specific options data reveals familiar crypto venues alongside a growing segment associated with listed ETF options, including IBIT.

This segmentation should be far more significant than it currently is since it alters the rhythm of trading, the mechanics of risk management, and the prevailing strategies driving demand.

Related Reading

BlackRock's $40B IBIT options: Is Bitcoin’s volatility now the market’s favorite income play?

The largest Bitcoin trade today isn’t buying, it’s overwriting.

Oct 21, 2025 · Andjela Radmilac

Crypto-native options venues function within a continuous market that trades over weekends, utilizing crypto collateral and catering to proprietary trading firms, crypto funds, and sophisticated retail investors. Listed ETF options operate during US market hours and are governed by a clearing and settlement framework familiar to equity options traders.

This results in a divide where a larger proportion of volatility risk can be expressed within regulated, onshore systems, even as global Bitcoin trading continues 24/7.

Market hours alone have the potential to reshape and even dictate behavior. When a significant portion of options flow is concentrated during US hours, hedging activities can become more synchronized within those windows, while offshore venues frequently lead price discovery during off-hours and weekends.

Over time, this can cause the market to resemble equities during US hours and more like crypto outside of them, even when the underlying asset remains the same. Traders managing risk across multiple venues bridge that gap using hedges and arbitrage, with futures often serving as the instrument that facilitates that bridge.

Clearing and margin discipline also influence participation. Listed options operate under standardized margining and centralized clearing structures that many institutions are equipped to utilize, broadening access for firms that cannot hold risk on offshore exchanges.

These participants bring established strategies, including covered call programs, collar overlays, and volatility targeting methods that already exist in equity portfolios. When these strategies enter Bitcoin via ETF options, they can generate recurring demand for specific tenors and strikes, maintaining elevated options inventory due to the program’s cyclical nature.

None of this diminishes the role of crypto-native venues, which continue to lead in continuous trading and in specialized volatility and basis strategies.

Related Reading

Bitcoin critical demand metric turns negative and ETFs wiped out $1.1 billion in 72 hours

Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing record outflows amidst macroeconomic challenges and declining demand.

Jan 9, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

What changes is the mix of who is holding options risk and why, with an increasing share reflecting portfolio overlays and structured flows rather than solely speculative positioning. This helps clarify why options open interest can remain elevated even during periods when futures are more susceptible to funding, basis compression, and risk-off deleveraging.

What the crossover means for volatility, liquidity, and how traders interpret the market

When options open interest exceeds futures, short-term market behavior tends to be more influenced by positioning geometry and hedging flows. Futures-heavy environments often express stress through funding feedback loops, basis distortions, and liquidation cascades that can quickly compress open interest.

Options-heavy environments typically exhibit stress through expiry cycles, strike concentration, and dealer hedging, which can either moderate or amplify spot movements based on how exposures are allocated.

Macro news and spot prices still play a role, but the market’s trajectory can depend on where options risk lies and how dealers hedge it. Leading up to large expiries, clustered strikes can become significant alongside news events, and post-expiry, the market frequently undergoes a rebuilding phase as traders re-establish exposure and roll structures forward.

The decline in late December followed by a rebuild in January fits this pattern and illustrates how inventory shifted through the year’s end.

Related Reading

Morgan Stanley just filed for two crypto ETFs, but one massive omission sends a brutal signal

Morgan Stanley's Bitcoin and Solana ETFs aim to take advantage of increasing institutional acceptance of crypto and a more favorable regulatory environment.

Jan 7, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

The practical takeaway is that derivatives positioning has become a more substantial driver for short-term price dynamics. Monitoring options open interest by venue can aid in distinguishing between offshore volatility positioning and onshore ETF-linked overlays, while futures open interest continues to be a vital indicator of leverage and basis appetite.

Thus, the same aggregate figures can suggest very different risk conditions based on whether positioning is concentrated in listed ETF options programs, crypto-native volatility frameworks, or futures carry trades that can unwind quickly.

The headline figures convey a clear message about Bitcoin’s evolving market structure. Options open interest around $74.1 billion compared to futures at approximately $65.22 billion indicates that more BTC risk is being held in instruments with defined payoff profiles and repeatable overlay strategies, while futures continue to serve as the primary avenue for directional leverage and hedging options exposure through delta.

As ETF options liquidity expands and crypto-native venues maintain their dominance in continuous trading, Bitcoin’s volatility may increasingly reflect the interplay between US market-hour liquidity and 24/7 crypto liquidity.

The crossover is a snapshot of that hybridization, highlighting a market where positioning, expiry, and hedging mechanics play a more significant role in price movements.

The post Bitcoin options just overtook futures for the first time, and the new way institutions hedge is trapping retail leverage appeared first on CryptoSlate.