Bitcoin has disrupted its typical macro correlation as the market begins to factor in a frightening new risk.

On Sunday evening, many individuals in the markets engaged in the same activity simultaneously: they accessed a video and heard a central banker sound as if he were reciting from a crisis guide.

Jerome Powell announced that the Federal Reserve had been served grand jury subpoenas and that the Trump administration had threatened a criminal indictment related to testimony associated with a renovation project.

Powell characterized it as a political pretext designed to exert pressure on the Fed to lower interest rates.

The Associated Press depicted it as an extraordinary escalation and a direct challenge to the notion that the Fed operates free from political influence.

The term “Fed independence” may seem like a theoretical notion until you witness its real-time repricing.

By Monday morning, the typical safety valves began to hiss.

Related Reading

Bitcoin traders are preparing for a Fed “credibility shock” tied to a crucial date this month

As Trump’s confrontation with Powell escalates, investors reevaluate Bitcoin’s significance in a transforming monetary environment.

Jan 12, 2026 · Oluwapelumi Adejumo

Gold surged to a record approximately $4,600 per ounce, the dollar weakened, and equity futures trended downward.

Reuters captured the sentiment across global markets as “stocks falter, dollar declines,” which is about as courteous as wire reports get when traders are essentially asking, “What if the rules change?”

Crypto behaved as it typically does when the macro narrative shifts from data to trust.

Bitcoin and Ethereum rose by about 1.5% and 1.2% respectively before retreating amid the dollar’s most significant decline in three weeks.

This is the moment when the usual crypto macro narrative, “rates up, Bitcoin down,” ceases to suffice.

Because the shock here extends beyond the upcoming Fed meeting.

It concerns whether the institution responsible for determining the cost of money can be influenced, intimidated, or coerced. That may sound abstract. Markets have a way of converting abstract concepts into tangible figures.

Independence risk carries a price, even if no one acknowledges it

Every cycle includes a moment when crypto traders realize that “macro” encompasses more than just a dot plot.

Sometimes it centers around liquidity. Other times it revolves around currency. Occasionally, it concerns what people believe will remain true in a year.

Related Reading

Why doesn't “good news” influence Bitcoin anymore? Macro headwinds consistently fall short

The “cuts are on the way” narrative is failing to elevate prices as high real yields and a cash crunch quietly stifle the rally.

Jan 2, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Central bank independence fits into that last category.

If investors perceive that the Fed’s response can be altered by legal threats or political pressures, they begin to demand compensation. They seek it in areas that are significant for crypto.

The International Monetary Fund has been notably candid on this topic.

According to the IMF, political pressures can undermine credibility, destabilize inflation expectations, and provoke broader instability.

It has also articulated the importance of safeguarding independence as a long-term anchor for price stability and trust.

Trust serves as the input. Pricing is the output.

When that trust is called into question, the market doesn’t wait for a constitutional discussion.

It starts searching for hedges, reprices volatility, and modifies its expectations of future policy under pressure.

This generates a new volatility channel for Bitcoin. The channel is governance risk.

Related Reading

This is how M2 money supply and the dollar REALLY influence Bitcoin price – The truth influencers aren't telling you

Social media oversimplifies M2 and dollar charts. Bitcoin’s drivers are significantly more intricate.

Nov 23, 2025 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

The three ways this could impact Bitcoin in 2026

If you seek a useful framework, you can consider Fed-independence risk as three overlapping transmission lines.

They may reinforce one another or counteract each other, which helps clarify why crypto can behave like gold on one day and like a leveraged tech proxy the next.

1) The dollar credibility channel

When independence is under pressure, investors begin to pose uncomfortable inquiries about the future trajectory of policy and the long-term commitment to price stability.

This reveals itself in the dollar.

Reuters noted the dollar index’s decline as investors assessed the political and fiscal risks implied by the escalation.

Gold typically benefits when the market seeks an asset that feels insulated from political turmoil.

The Financial Times directly linked the record gold surge to concerns about Fed independence.

Crypto’s significance in this context is both emotional and financial.

Bitcoin’s inception is rooted in skepticism towards institutions, and whenever the world’s most influential central bank appears to be under pressure, that narrative resurfaces.

2) The term premium channel

There’s a technical term that becomes headline news the moment institutional trust is questioned: term premium.

Term premium refers to the additional compensation investors require for holding long-dated government bonds, above what they anticipate short-term rates will average over time.

It’s where the sentiment “this seems riskier than it used to” often resides.

The New York Fed publishes a widely referenced estimate known as the ACM term premium.

The San Francisco Fed provides an alternative breakdown for Treasury yields that also distinguishes expected short rates from a term premium component.

If long-term yields decline without a significant change in near-term rate expectations, term premium is generally part of the narrative.

This is relevant for Bitcoin because term premium serves as the bond market’s signal that “uncertainty is increasing.”

Some sell-side research has been linking this directly to Bitcoin.

Geoff Kendrick at Standard Chartered has suggested that Bitcoin’s correlation with the 10-year term premium has strengthened since early 2024, using that perspective in his medium-term Bitcoin analysis.

3) The plumbing channel, rates volatility, and liquidity

Even if you never consider the term “independence,” you still experience its effects in market mechanics.

Independence risk tends to heighten uncertainty. Uncertainty increases volatility. Volatility tightens risk budgets, which alters how much leverage the system can sustain.

In the realm of rates, the shorthand for this is MOVE, the Treasury volatility index.

ICE defines MOVE as a leading indicator of fixed-income volatility, based on options related to rates.

When rates volatility rises, it affects cross-asset positioning.

This impacts crypto through leverage, funding, and forced unwinds.

In practice, it can also overshadow the “Bitcoin as a hedge” narrative in the short term, since liquidations do not wait for narratives to resolve.

This explains why Bitcoin can initially rally on the first headline but then drop sharply if the move incites broader deleveraging.

Related Reading

Billionaire Ray Dalio reiterates warnings of dollar decline, suggests Bitcoin as a hedge

Billionaire investor and hedge fund manager Ray Dalio forecasts that diminishing trust in the dollar may drive investors towards Bitcoin and gold.

Sep 3, 2025 · Assad Jafri

Why 2026 turns this into a calendar trade

The market can handle noise but struggles with deadlines.

2026 brings deadlines.

Powell’s term as chair concludes in May 2026, transforming succession into a pricing factor.

Additionally, there’s a legal storyline on the calendar.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments related to President Trump’s attempt to dismiss Fed Governor Lisa Cook, with oral arguments set for January 2026, according to Mayer Brown’s legal analysis of the Court’s order.

ABC News also reported that the Court would address the case and allow Cook to remain for the time being.

Combine these elements, and independence risk shifts from being a vague notion.

It becomes associated with specific dates, and dates generate trades.

What crypto markets should monitor, a practical dashboard

If you prefer a streamlined approach without overwhelming details, you can refer to it as a “trust dashboard.”

These are the indicators that will indicate which channel is prevailing week by week.

Monitor the dollar as the global referendum.

Reuters already pointed out the dollar’s weakness as traders absorbed the escalation.

In upcoming developments, keep an eye on the DXY and the dollar’s performance against the Swiss franc and euro.

These are classic “trust” pairs that tend to fluctuate when individuals seek to distance themselves from US political risks.

Related Reading

A sudden $13.5 billion Fed liquidity injection reveals a crack in the dollar that Bitcoin was designed for

Dollar funding shifted at the margin this week, and Bitcoin is the asset that feels the margin first.

Dec 7, 2025 · Andjela Radmilac

Monitor long-end yields for term premium behavior.

Pull the daily series from the New York Fed’s term premia page and cross-reference it with the San Francisco Fed’s yield premium breakdowns.

Rising term premium amid governance headlines is an indicator that the market is pricing in a persistent credibility risk.

Monitor rates volatility as the liquidity tripwire.

MOVE serves as the simplest, headline-friendly proxy.

ICE’s definition provides a useful one-liner for readers who may not be familiar with bond options.

If MOVE increases while Bitcoin rallies, it suggests the credibility-hedge story is outweighing the deleveraging narrative.

If MOVE rises and Bitcoin declines, the plumbing is gaining the upper hand.

Monitor gold and Bitcoin together, then observe who leads.

Gold has already surged to a record due to the independence headlines.

When gold leads and Bitcoin follows, markets are generally operating in “credibility hedge” mode.

When Bitcoin leads and gold remains stable, crypto is typically trading as liquidity beta.

Three scenarios for 2026, with signposts

Predicting political outcomes with precision is impossible. However, markets don’t require precision. They need ranges and signals.

Here are three scenarios that encompass most plausible outcomes, along with the signposts that would appear in the dashboard.

Scenario A: Institutions absorb the shock

The legal battle prolongs, the Fed’s operational independence remains intact, and the market perceives the incident as a temporary flare-up that dissipates.

In this scenario, term premium stabilizes, MOVE remains contained, and the dollar ceases to respond to every headline after a few cycles.

Crypto implication: Bitcoin returns to trading primarily based on liquidity, growth, and risk appetite.

Signposts: steady ACM term premium, muted MOVE, no sustained dollar trend following headlines.

Scenario B: Chronic pressure becomes the baseline

Pressure turns into a recurring issue, the market begins to price in a persistent governance premium, and each new legal development triggers another minor repricing.

The dollar weakens during shocks, gold remains in demand, and term premium gradually increases as investors seek more compensation for uncertainty.

Crypto implication: Bitcoin’s identity remains divided.

It rallies during credibility concerns, declines during liquidity squeezes, and volatility becomes part of the overall scenario.

Signposts: repeated dollar declines during “feud” moments, consistent demand for gold, term premium gradually rising in breakdowns.

Scenario C: Markets price a reaction-function shift

Leadership outcomes and legal precedents convince investors that policy can be influenced.

This is the environment where term premium may surge, inflation expectations become more volatile, and cross-asset volatility increases.

Historical research helps explain why markets take this seriously.

Studies on Nixon-era pressure on Fed Chair Arthur Burns demonstrate how political interference can influence policy decisions and outcomes, often cited as a cautionary tale.

Recent academic research has compiled datasets on presidential interactions with Fed officials and estimates the macro effects of political pressure shocks.

Crypto implication: Bitcoin may receive a medium-term boost as a credibility hedge, while still experiencing severe short-term drawdowns when market plumbing tightens.

Signposts: higher term premium in ACM, increased rates volatility in MOVE, sustained dollar weakness, and larger fluctuations in risk assets.

A final detail markets will continue to scrutinize, the rate cut backdrop

It’s easy to overlook this amidst dramatic headlines, but the underlying macro context remains significant.

Some major forecasters are already anticipating easing in 2026.

Goldman Sachs has released a rate-cut forecast for 2026 in its research commentary, including a trajectory towards lower policy rates throughout the year under its macro assumptions.

This is important because independence risk can alter how the market interprets rate cuts.

If cuts occur due to a weakening economy, that presents one narrative. If cuts appear to arise under pressure, that tells a different story, potentially pushing investors into hedges even as nominal rates decline.

Crypto traders don’t need to become historians of the Fed to navigate this distinction.

They only need to monitor what the bond market is demanding for uncertainty.

Because this week’s Powell moment signaled that a new kind of macro risk has emerged.

In 2026, Fed independence comes with deadlines, legal arguments, and now a market reaction.

That transforms it into a tradable factor.

Crypto markets should regard it as such, track it like a factor, and acknowledge it as a factor.

The post Bitcoin just broke its classic macro correlation because the market is suddenly pricing a terrifying new risk appeared first on CryptoSlate.